Progress Consultants Survey

This is the main page for information about the status of the Progress Consultants survey.

(If you can't see the posts, click on the title of this page to bring the full page into view; then you should be able to see what's been posted so far).


Use of Forums and Email Groups

Participating Consultants

55 Progress Consultants have been interviewed as of this post. Click on the image to load a popup chart with a breakdown by country of Consultants. Consultants are also reinterviewed as the questions currently being asked are different or more extensive than previously; this increases the percentage of respondents who have answered questions on a subject. Please send me additional interesting questions. For people who are no longer running a consulting business, the data submitted represents the last state of the Consultant’s business.

I’m still collecting data for the Progress Consultant survey, so if you’ve thought about participating, email me right away! See about participating in the survey and other survey updates. Because of the project is ongoing, some posts may get updated from time to time.

Use of Forums and Email Groups

Between 56% and 64% of Consultants interviewed answered (some) detailed questions about his/her participation on various forums. From one snapshot of the respondents:
29% of respondents come from the continent of Europe;
68% from North America (18% from Canada, 50% from US);
3% of respondents come from the continent of Africa.
So far the detailed African sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses below. Consultants from continent of Asia have not provided detailed data about forum interactions.

Here are the forums included in this analysis:
How do Consultants report using PSDN?
How do Consultants report using PEG?
How do Consultants report using ProgressTalk?

PEG’s main OpenEdge forum is by far the most used site amongst PSDN, PEG and ProgressTalk forums. This may not be too surprising since I unearthed many of my early survey respondents from posters to forums. On PEG I posted a general invitation to respond, but few did; I also invited people directly which was more successful. On PSDN I posted an invitation for people to respond to the survey, but, as I could not email people directly, I didn’t get many responses from this venue. On ProgressTalk I could not get anyone to figure out why I was unable to post. On LinkedIn, I posted a group invitation and asked people directly, some of which was successful. As I interviewed people I asked for recommendations to other Progress Consultants, and as such, I have started to communicate with Consultants who never visit forums at all.

Although some respondents were consistent throughout each individual forum, many were not. Many respondents had 2-3 forums in which they lurked or participated. Amongst Consultants, which particular forums each participated in differed.

If a message is posted once in a forum, how likely are you to see it?

See Consultants' Frequency of Forum (or emaillist) Interaction.

When you get to a forum, how do you read?

Forum Reading Patterns

Are forums a reliable educational resource?

How educational are forums?

How do your customers and prospects use forums?

Forum participation for customers and prospects

Look for more information on Progress Consultants and forums in the coming weeks.

Back to Consultants Survey Main Page.


PSDN Usage

Between 56% and 60% of Consultants interviewed answered (some) detailed questions about his/her participation on PSDN forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

As results show, there are a few forums where people visit consistently. Click on the image below to load the popup with the chart details.










Of the responses, these are the most interesting remarks about PSDN:

  • Fewer people watch PSDN than PEG. There’s less noise.
  • I see everything; I ignore lots of it.
  • Posting on PSDN would contribute to my visibility, but they’ve run out of interesting topics—haven’t been there in over a year. Do visit psdn.com monthly though.
  • I actively recommend PSDN to my customer base (more than just forums), so my customers go there. For European clients, it’s the best place for visibility.
  • I can’t answer your questions about the site and forums because I go so rarely. I can’t distinguish between them.
  • I go to psdn.com now and again. Very rarely visit forum. Like PEG much better.
  • I go to psdn.com frequently. I go to the forum infrequently. Non-English speakers have a barrier about using these resources. An outline in languages other than English would be helpful. I have seen some Spanish sites. Of course Microsoft has lots of Italian and German knowledge base and newsletters. There are blogs in Italian and German for C#, java, and hardware—but not Progress. Pity.

Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


PEG Usage

Between 60% and 64% of Consultants interviewed answered (some) detailed questions about his/her participation on PEG email and forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

As results show, there are a few forums where people visit consistently. Click on the image below to load the popup.





Of the responses, these are the most interesting remarks about PEG:

  • Greg never tells us anything, so this will be interesting to see.
  • I don’t find PSDN as useful or user-friendly as PEG.
  • If I have difficulty, I go to PEG. Not very often.
  • I frequented PEG more when search engine was in place.
  • I use http://www.tek-tips.com/ for Progress research because it has other languages.
  • This is the only real place for Progress networking and marketing. I’m only an occasional poster because I’m trying to leave Progress.
  • PEG is a much more viable resource than PSDN.

Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


ProgressTalk Usage

58% of Consultants interviewed answered (some) detailed questions about his/her participation on ProgressTalk forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

As results show, there are a few forums where people visit consistently, though less so that the other forums. Click on the image below to load the popup with the chart details.








Of the responses, these are the most interesting remarks about ProgressTalk:

  • I may have looked at the site long, long ago.
  • I visit maybe three times per year.
  • I have political issues with the site.
  • Found it completely irrelevant when I visited, so I don't.
  • There are some things which are only posted on ProgressTalk, so I go there.

Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


Frequency of Forum participation

Consultants answered questions about his/her participation in email and forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

Of Participating Consultants,
64% answered for a message posted on PSDN;
62% answered for a message posted on PEG;
56% answered for a message posted on ProgressTalk.

If a message is posted to a Forum once, how likely are you to see it?

Consultants are much more likely to see timely information on PEG than PSDN forums. Europeans have different reading frequencies than do North Americans. The sample from Africa is small, so those Consultants are not itemized in this report. Consultants from Asia have provided no detailed data. Click on the image of the chart to see the details of this section of the survey.


Of the responses, these are the most interesting remarks:

  • I’ll see it only if it’s posted to PEG’s OpenEdge forum.
  • It depends upon how busy I am. Once upon a time I saw everything. For the past few months I’ve been invisible.
  • If it’s in a forum I watch, I’ll see it—but not otherwise.

Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


Forum Reading Patterns

Consultants answered questions about his/her participation in email and forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

Of Participating Consultants,
65% of respondents answered about participation in PSDN;
67% of respondents answered about participation in PEG;
35% of respondents answered about participation in ProgressTalk.

Reading Patterns - PSDN

This chart shows how Consultants, domiciled in different continents, have divergent reading patterns of PSDN. Click on the chart to load the popup image.










These are the most interesting remarks about reading patterns on PSDN:

  • I read only the one forum.
  • Formerly went there, not currently.
  • I visit psdn.com and the forum.
  • I visit psdn.com rarely. Never go to the forum.
  • However, I had one contract because a colleague noticed someone's posts and told me about him. It was a good trigger for me to get introduced to a new Partner. Got a big contract. Big success!
  • I only go to the site when I’m looking for something.
  • Long ago I subscribed. Now I visit periodically to read, but not too often.
  • I get all postings on email, read more of them for some forums than used to.
  • When I need something, I’ll hunt around forum. Never post.
  • All participation at site is researching some issues I have; I don't get curious and hang around much.
  • There are lots of discussions about stuff I'm vaguely interested in but don't work in.
Reading Patterns - PEG

This chart shows how Consultants, domiciled in different continents, have divergent reading patterns of PEG.Click on the image of the chart to see the details of this section of the survey.










These are the most interesting remarks about reading patterns on PEG:

  • The signal to noise ratio is too low. People get buttonholed into one aspect of a problem and don't look at the whole problem. Then 87 people answer, many in a very similar way. Some of the answers may even be correct. I usually respond when a PEG email is forwarded to me by someone I know well, because the post's something I know about. Then I try to respond to all the issues in one post.
  • I read the DBA forum once every 2 weeks from the archive only.
  • PEG used to come up on web searches (maybe still does).
  • Depends upon whether I’m really busy on a project. If I have time, I visit.
  • I download data every 2 or 3 months and then look through it. Depends upon how busy I am.
  • I'm a lurker, not a poster. There are 4-6 heavy posters, at least one of whom will respond to 95% of every posting. I can't imagine the amount of time these guys spend writing replies—I don't see how they can get any work done ;)
  • I used to read 10%, am now reading 50%.
  • I’m a PEG subscriber, but don't check it often. Spot read now. In the past I was a heavy PEG user but since PSDN has come around, I get most of what I need from there.
  • Depends on the list. I subscribe to peg with a gmail account, so it's already grouped by argument. Currently have 3000 unread messages. A message being read depends largely on the title.
Reading Patterns - Progress Talk

This chart shows how Consultants, domiciled in different continents, have divergent reading patterns of ProgressTalk forum. Click on the chart to load the popup image.










These are the most interesting remarks about reading patterns on ProgressTalk:

  • I go to ProgressTalk only once or twice per year, only when I’m looking for information.
  • Recently I've been visiting every couple of days. Previously I *never* used to come here. Am coming mostly to keep myself busy, not because I think the resource has improved.
  • I don’t actually think it is much of a resource (for me at least)
  • Go to ProgressTalk maybe 5 times per year. Some stuff is posted there which is no where else.
Combined Reading Patterns

Here are the average reading patterns of PSDN, PEG and ProgressTalk forums compared together. Click on the chart to load the popup image.











Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


Forums as an Educational Resource

Consultants answered questions about his/her participation in email and forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

Are forums a reliable educational resource?

Of Participating Consultants,
62% of respondents answered how educational he/she found PSDN;
60% of respondents answered how educational he/she found PEG;
58% of respondents answered how educational he/she found ProgressTalk.
Consultants responded from three continents. So far the detailed African sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses.

Consultants find somewhat more educational value from PEG than PSDN forums. Europeans generally find more educational value from forums than do Europeans. Click on the image of the chart to see a popup link with the details of this section of the survey.





Of the responses, these are the most interesting remarks:

  • Once PEG was very educational, now it’s a slugfest.
  • I’ve never visited PSDN forums, my remarks are about the whole "communities" site.

Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


Forum participation for Customers and Prospects

Consultants answered questions about his/her participation in email and forums. For a breakdown of Consultants participating in this section of the Progress Consultants survey, refer to Participating Consultants.

Do Consultants’ customers’ IT employees subscribe to forums?

Of the Participating Consultants,
38% of respondents answered customers’ usage of PSDN;
53% of respondents answered customers’ usage of PEG;
20% of respondents answered customers’ usage of ProgressTalk.
Consultants responded from three continents. So far the detailed African sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses.

Consultants are more confident of their customers’ participation with PEG than PSDN forums. Europeans have higher participation in PSDN than PEG. Click on the image of the chart to see a popup link with the details of this section of the survey.



These are the most interesting remarks about customers’ IT employees subscribing to various forums:

  • It’s hard to tell, they don’t post.
  • People are aware of it; none is active.
  • Less than none, because the posts are all in English.
  • None of my customers has an IT department.
  • 10 years ago 100% of my customers subscribed to PEG, now I’ve no idea.
  • Probably zero—they wouldn’t understand what they see; wouldn’t see value of them.
  • I’ve always encouraged them as a source to go to for help with the small stuff, so they don’t call me.

Do Consultants’ prospects’ IT employees subscribe to forums?

Of the Participating Consultants,
31% of respondents answered prospective customers’ usage of PSDN;
45% of respondents answered prospective customers’ usage of PEG;
18% of respondents answered prospective customers’ usage of ProgressTalk.
Consultants responded from three continents. So far the detailed African sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses.

Consultants are also more confident of their prospective customers’ participation with PEG than PSDN forums. Click on the image of the chart to see a popup link with the details of this section of the survey.






These are the most interesting remarks about prospective customers’ IT employees subscribing to various forums:

  • I hope that lots do, but I don’t know really.
  • 10 years ago 80% of my prospective customers subscribed to PEG, now I’ve no idea.
  • I’m likely to hear about it more with new customers; they'll say that they've read a lot of my posts.
  • No idea, I’ve never been to that site.

How many forum viewers are your potential customer?

Of the Participating Consultants,
35% of respondents answered prospective customers’ usage of PSDN;
45% of respondents answered prospective customers’ usage of PEG;
20% of respondents answered prospective customers’ usage of ProgressTalk.
Consultants responded from three continents. So far the detailed African sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses.

Consultants are more confident that forums are filled with potential customers. Click on the image of the chart to see a popup link with the details of this section of the survey.





Of the responses, these are the most interesting remarks about forums as a venue for potential customers:

  • No idea. How many subscribers are there?
  • Very many because of our toolset. There’s a huge potential in the Progress community for our tools. Marketing is of course abusing the protocol of the PEG, but if a question is asked, one can give a solution that includes making remarks about our tools, and people who are interested will see it.
  • Many could be, but it’s unlikely. There are lots of low end developers and consultants who aren't likely to ask for help. The interaction is nice though.
  • Prospective customers would be higher on PSDN than PEG, for sure.
  • Slightly more than none, but certainly not very many.
  • Only Greg knows; he’s worse than PSC for hiding information from the community.
  • I don't know, I’ve never thought about PEG in a marketing aspect. I met another PEG contributor who's local and developed a relationship, but that's only once. I suppose that maybe 20% of PEG subscribers might have jobs which I could do. No data has ever been released on the subscribers, more's the pity.
  • Only those in my country. Since Greg has never disclosed anything about membership, it's hard to guess.
  • Sure there are some, but that’s not why I go to PEG..

Back to Discussion of Forums Main Page
Back to Consultants Survey Main Page


Travel practices and onsite work for Consultants

I’m still collecting data for the Progress Consultant survey, so if you’ve thought about participating, now’s the time to get involved! See about participating in the survey and other survey updates. Because of the project is ongoing, some posts may get updated from time to time.

54 Consultants have been interviewed as of this post. For people who are no longer running a consulting business, the data submitted represents the last state of the Consultant’s business.

Travel practices and remote work of Consultants

67% of Consultants provided data about travel to a client site.

33% of respondents come from the continent of Europe
64% from North America (17% from Canada, 47% from US)
3% of respondents come from the continent of Africa.
So far the African sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses below. Consultants from continent of Asia have not provided data about travel practices.

How far do you travel to a client?

33% of respondents travel more than 5K miles to a client site (in one direction only).
This includes 25% of European consultants and 38% of North American consultants.

41% of respondents travel less than 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) to visit any client.
This includes 75% of Europeans and 25% of North Americans.

66% of respondents gave no variation in the distance they have travelled for the duration of their consulting practice. Of the persons who’ve experienced changes in the distance they’ve travelled, these are the most interesting remarks:

How many miles do you travel annually?

62% of Consultants provided data about current annual miles travelled,
67% provided data about highest/lowest annual miles travelled.

Respondents travel an average of 31K miles annually. Over time this has ranged from an average of 27K to 65K miles annually. The highest respondents used to travel 250K miles per year. The lowest report no travel at all.

17% respondents travel more than 70K miles annually (currently).
This includes 1% of Europeans and 17% of North Americans

42% respondents travel less than 10K miles annually
This includes 25% of Europeans and 52% of North Americans

24% of respondents gave no variation in the annual distance they travel to client sites. Of the persons who’ve experienced changes, these are the most interesting remarks:

How much of your work is done onsite?

80% of Consultants provided information about work done onsite.

Respondents currently perform 52% work onsite. Onsite work has ranged from an average of 43% to 70%.

30% of respondents come from the continent of Europe
65% from North America (16% from Canada, 49% from US)
2% of respondents come from the continent of Africa.
2% of respondents come from the continent of Asia.
So far the African and Asian sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses below.

35% of respondents do more than 70% of work onsite.
This includes 30% of Europeans and 65% of North Americans.

23% of respondents do less than 25% of work onsite.
This includes 30% of Europeans and 21% of North Americans.

These are the most interesting remarks:

Do you have any remote-only clients?

76% of Consultants provided information about remote only clients.

Respondents currently have 30% of work as remote-only contracts. Remote contracts have ranged from an average of 16% to 30%.

32% of respondents come from the continent of Europe
63% from North America (16% from Canada, 49% from US)
2% of respondents come from the continent of Africa.
2% of respondents come from the continent of Asia.
So far the African and Asian sample is very low, so they are not itemized in the analyses below.

22% of respondents have remote-only contracts for more than 70% of workload.
This includes 23% of Europeans and 23% of North Americans.

24% of respondents have remote-only contracts for less than 20% of workload.
This includes 31% of Europeans and 23% of North Americans.

34% of respondents have no remote-only contracts.
This includes 38% of Europeans and 31% of North Americans.

These are the most interesting remarks:

The Progress Consultants survey is ongoing. We'd appreciate hearing your remarks and suggestions.


Survey update December 2009

Here's an update on the status of the Progress Consultants survey:

44 persons have completed surveys (4 of which were early in the interview process so my questions need further clarification).
7 persons are in process of completing surveys (4 of which are email where no data has been returned yet).
38 persons have indicated interest in participating in the survey, but no action has occurred yet.
89 people total are involved in the survey

From completed and in process surveys, we have the following results:
47 consultants
44 unique companies

The consultants range in age from 30 to 63.

Experience for respondents ranges from:
10-42 years in IT,
9-26 years involved with Progress, and
0-30 years as a consultant.

17% of the respondents were previously Progress Software Corporation employees with 2 to 13 years with PSC.

All but two of the completed and in-process survey participants are male. None of the prospective survey participants is female. (C’mon ladies, let’s show a stronger presence!)

We have participants from 12 countries.

The company sizes range significantly. There are firms with a single individual consultant to firms where there are 150 consultants with Progress specialty or 1000 consultants with various specialties.

Much data are interesting. For instance:
In this economy, a great many consultants have had a lessening of work, but a few have more work than they can handle.

Many answers were not what I expected, so probably not what you were expecting either. Stay tuned!

If you’re interested in participating, please see Progress consultants survey, or send an email to: TdeV at bstw dot com.

Thanks, Theresa de Valence.


Progress Consultants needed!

I am conducting a survey of consultants with a specialization in Progress OpenEdge and other products from PSC. Participants will receive aggregated results which should prove interesting for your consulting practice.

The goal of the survey is to provide information about the market to Progress consultants. We are interested in your experiences in the current economy, as well as the kind of services you provide to clients, how far you travel to client sites, how and where you get new clients, your experiences with legacy code bases, your participation in PUGs, etc.

We are interested in consultants with a long history, as well as those who have just begun in the consulting realm. We are looking for individuals who own consulting firms and employees of firms with a consulting division, regardless of their role in the firm.

Of course, the more consultants who speak with me, the more interesting the results of the survey will be. The survey should take about 45 minutes of your time (it can also be abbreviated if you wish). The survey is best conducted orally (better to catch nuances, muttered comments, jokes, etc.:). Unfortunately, the only language I speak well enough to conduct the survey is English, but a limited survey can be conducted via email if spoken English is too difficult.

I am working as a research consultant in association with Computing Integrity (http://www.cintegrity.com) which is a longtime Progress Application Partner with a specialization in modernizing legacy code bases.

This may be the first and only survey of Progress consultants. I hope you will decide to participate. Send an email to TdeV at bstw dot com.

Thanks in advance for your interest.

Theresa de Valence